Comments on: Google Chrome Extension Support

By: Sachin

Sachin — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:44:31 +0000

Google chrome still crashes more in running the Java Script whereas firefox is more stable.

By: Rob Cook

Rob Cook — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:57:14 +0000

I think Chrome need to do lot more support from this kinds of tool, which make its very easy to operating as per Firefox.

By: arie

arie — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 23:36:32 +0000

if chrome add-ons as much as FF, I’ll use it as main browser

By: Islam Australia

Islam Australia — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:25:10 +0000

Google chrome is really good and fast. But I agree with Chester that there should be plugin support on Chrome.

By: mike

mike — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:23:24 +0000

Plugins is the way to go

By: Orlando Website Design

Orlando Website Design — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:18:00 +0000

Well its a very nice idea of adding an extension system, which will enable third-party developers to produce plugins for any number of add-on features.We want plugin support on Chrome as i m a big fan of Chrome and i think because of plugins FF is most popular.Once Chrome will have this features the users start using Chrome more.It will become more popular than any other browser.

By: Job Finders

Job Finders — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:00:24 +0000

I believe that this plugin is useful. I have tried it and love it so much that I have referred it to my friends and family. If you have firefox, then you should try this add on.

By: Noter

Noter — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 08:04:58 +0000

I’m ageed with TechMagazine, why firefox is so popular right now is because of tons of great add-on / plugins. We can do almost everything with firefox.

By: Fred

Fred — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:43:44 +0000

For a web developer, FF is the way to go. The plugins make it the best choice. Plugins like Firebug make debugging Javascript much easier. Chrome would need plugin support if they want to compete with FF.

By: nugroz

nugroz — Mon, 18 May 2009 22:58:16 +0000

sometime l’am used internet explorer, but ‘am like firefox..

By: New Mini Laptop

New Mini Laptop — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:28:17 +0000

It’d be great to see an adblock plugin for Chrome. I think the adblock is the best feature Firefox offers (not to say it doesn’t offer others). But I don’t know how happy Google would be with extensions that block their main revenue source.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:20:20 +0000

I must say, Chrome may lack third party enabled plugins/add ons, however, the design is basic, which is logical enough for me, since there is really no need for customized looks, that makes Chrome quite efficient, and though it currently does not support third party plugins/add ons, MINE does. Why would anyone that knows what they are doing simply wait for Google to do something and then download it? Simply make the adjustment yourself, as I have. Use a simple string coded page loading with a second party plugin/add on, which you set as your homepage, you can have it communicate with an FTP server which you create on your harddrive as use something such as port 337 for some basic communications between the browser and your FTP server. Like that is rocket science or something, really, think for yourself, it is cheaper and faster than waiting for a company to do it for you. I happen to like Chrome very much, and i will continue to use it. I still use other browsers though, mostly Firefox, but for different reasons.

By: Gadget Sift

Gadget Sift — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:13:34 +0000

Google chrome hasn’t really taken off yet, but opening up plugins should help, it is after all pretty much what Firefox’s popularity has been built on.

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:53:12 +0000

At the end of the day Firefox is the best choice IMO. Chrome is fast, but Firefox is easily just as fast for me when I turn off the external add-ons such as roboform and skins on Firefox.

At this point, Firefox offers the best security, and the best speeds. In comparison, IE offers more viruses than a Vietnamese prostitute. (So sorry about that, I had to, honest.)

My point is, even Opera, as great as it is in it’s own ways, is still not as good. And it seems to me at least to be overkill on many levels. Chrome for me is just fast, and sleek. That’s about it. I’m not sure about the security though.

I’d still recommend Firefox 3 over any other browser.

By: Tech Magazine

Tech Magazine — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:16:53 +0000

We definitely want plugin support on Chrome. It is plugins that made Firefox popular.

By: Chester

Chester — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:40:39 +0000

I agree with Brian and Gautam. Now that there’s another vulnerability that just came out for IE, it’s not even a surprise anymore. Even though reports say Google Chrome is faster than FF, I’m still a FF fan because it’s still a lot faster than IE, and you have a lot of extensions/themes/etc. for free. My faves are Adblock Plus, Web Developer, and Tab Mix Plus (with undo closed tabs). I don’t know why Google is trying to dominate everything.

By: Brian

Brian — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:08:29 +0000

I don’t know why anyone would still be using Internet Explorer. I am not a big fan of Chrome either, though.

By: Gautam

Gautam — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:33:37 +0000

I think FF should not be considered as alternate browser anymore. It’s growth has been strong, and from a simple glance at the stats in the past few years, one can boldly say that FF will take over IE.

I used chrome, not a big fan of it. Maybe because I’m biased by FF.