<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transcend SATA-II 2.5&#8243; SSD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetadvisor.com/computer-hardware/transcend-sata-ii-25-ssd/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetadvisor.com/computer-hardware/transcend-sata-ii-25-ssd</link>
	<description>Cutting Through the Cutting Edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:08:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peddu</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetadvisor.com/computer-hardware/transcend-sata-ii-25-ssd/comment-page-1#comment-7165</link>
		<dc:creator>peddu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetadvisor.com/?p=800#comment-7165</guid>
		<description>Pros: Inexpensive, large capacity for the price. 

Cons: Slow. Slow. Slow. The specs on this drive are woefully inaccurate. The drive doesn&#039;t even come close to the read/write speeds quoted. I get sustained reads somewhere in the 90 MB/s category which is acceptable for the price. The writes however are in the 40-45 MB/s category. Tested in both XP and Ubuntu, tweaked every imaginable setting (deadline IO/Scheduler, fifo_batch, noatime, disabled indexing etc..) yet cannot get the drive to perform anywhere near the expected levels. 

Other Thoughts: If you can handle the slow speeds, the drive *is* very inexpensive. I have decided to move this drive over to the backup/archive section. Here&#039;s hoping it lasts


Regards

Peddu
hostcats.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pros: Inexpensive, large capacity for the price. </p>
<p>Cons: Slow. Slow. Slow. The specs on this drive are woefully inaccurate. The drive doesn&#8217;t even come close to the read/write speeds quoted. I get sustained reads somewhere in the 90 MB/s category which is acceptable for the price. The writes however are in the 40-45 MB/s category. Tested in both XP and Ubuntu, tweaked every imaginable setting (deadline IO/Scheduler, fifo_batch, noatime, disabled indexing etc..) yet cannot get the drive to perform anywhere near the expected levels. </p>
<p>Other Thoughts: If you can handle the slow speeds, the drive *is* very inexpensive. I have decided to move this drive over to the backup/archive section. Here&#8217;s hoping it lasts</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Peddu<br />
hostcats.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hassan Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetadvisor.com/computer-hardware/transcend-sata-ii-25-ssd/comment-page-1#comment-4338</link>
		<dc:creator>Hassan Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetadvisor.com/?p=800#comment-4338</guid>
		<description>need  complete details of Transcend SATA A 2.5 SSD Drive and prices</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>need  complete details of Transcend SATA A 2.5 SSD Drive and prices</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

